Resilience And Disaster Recovery Planning In The Context Of Digital Transformation – Open Access Policy Institutional Open Access Program Special Issues Guidelines Editorial Process Research and Publication Ethics Article Processing Fees Awards Testimonials
All of his published articles are immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No specific permission is required to reuse all or part of an article published by , including figures and tables. For articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY open access license, any part of the article may be reused without permission as long as the original article is clearly cited. For more information, see https:///openaccess.
Resilience And Disaster Recovery Planning In The Context Of Digital Transformation
Featured articles represent cutting-edge research with significant potential for major impact in the field. The article should be a significant original article that includes several techniques or approaches, provides perspective for future research directions, and describes possible research applications.
Iso 22301, The Business Continuity Management Standard
Featured articles are submitted at the invitation or individual recommendation of scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations from editors of scientific journals around the world. The editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be of particular interest to readers or important to a particular area of research. The aim is to provide an overview of some of the most interesting papers published in the various research areas of the journal.
Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project: A community-wide public health initiative to build community disaster resilience
Information Technology Disaster Resilience Plan Virtualization Disaster Recovery Plan Background Pdf
David Eisenman David Eisenman Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 1, 2, * , Anita Chandra Anita Chandra Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 3, Stella Fogleman Stella Fogleman Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 1, Aizita Magana Aizita Magana Scilit Preprints.org Google Academic 1, Astrid Hendricks Astrid Hendricks Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 1, Ken Wells Ken Wells Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 4, Malcolm Williams Malcolm Williams Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 5, Jennifer Tang Jennifer Tang Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 4 and Alonzo Plow Alonzo Plow Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar 6
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Program, 600 S. Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90005, USA
Center for Public Health and Disasters, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, P.O. Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Resilience, Disaster Recovery & Mitigation Planning
Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, 10920 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
Received: 20 June 2014 / Revised: 24 July 2014 / Accepted: 14 August 2014 / Published: 19 August 2014
Public health officials need evidence-based methods to improve community resilience to disasters and strategies to measure outcomes. This methods paper describes how one public health department is tackling this problem. This article provides a detailed description of the theoretical underpinnings, intervention design, and new evaluation of the Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project (LACCDR), a public health program to increase community disaster resilience. The LACCDR project uses a pretest-posttest method with a control group design. Sixteen communities in Los Angeles County were selected and randomly assigned to either an experimental community resilience group or a comparison group. Community coalitions in the experimental group receive training from a public health nurse trained in community resilience in a tool developed for the project. The manual is grounded in theory and uses multiple components to address education, community engagement, community and individual self-reliance, and partnerships between community organizations and government agencies. Benchmark communities receive training on traditional disaster preparedness topics such as disaster supplies and emergency communications plans. Outcome indicators include longitudinal changes in inter-organizational linkages between community organizations, community member responses in tableau exercises, and changes in household-level community resilience behaviors and attitudes. The LACCDR project is a significant opportunity and effort to meaningfully operationalize and measure factors and strategies to increase community resilience. This document aims to provide academic and public health researchers with new tools to conduct their community resilience programs and evaluation research. Results are not yet available and will be presented in future reports.
Disaster Recovery: An Introduction
As disasters grow in scale, frequency, duration and cost around the world, it is clear that communities cannot rely on national government dollars and agencies to provide effective and comprehensive disaster response and recovery. Furthermore, disasters in urban centers with diverse communities and growing inequalities challenge the capacity of governments to manage the complex social, health, housing and financial challenges of response and recovery without local and community involvement . In preparation for the post-2015 Hyogo Framework for Action, countries around the world emphasize that local governments and community-based organizations should be supported and encouraged to implement community resilience programs . In the United States, local health departments and response agencies have often reached out to nongovernmental agencies and local community and faith-based organizations during disasters to learn about the needs, resources, and social complexities of the neighborhoods they serve [3, 4, 5, 6].
Community resilience, or the sustainable capacity of a community to withstand and recover from adversity, emphasizes that effective and efficient disaster risk reduction, response and recovery requires a whole-of-community approach, stating that partnerships with non-governmental partners, the commitment of local communities and an orientation towards community self-sufficiency is the basis of this approach . The World Health Organization encourages member states to use coordinated and multisectoral approaches to disaster risk reduction, response and recovery . In the United States, community resilience has become an integral part of several national directives [9, 10], including the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Public Health Emergency Prevention (PHEP) cooperative agreements  and the Federal Emergency Management Agency agreements. management. FEMA) Imperative “Everything from Community Planning” . FEMA’s approach prescribes as policy that cooperation, local empowerment, and collective community response are critical to preparedness, response, and recovery . “CDC PHEP agreements that provide funding to state and local health departments provide a set of public health preparedness options to assist health departments in their strategic planning to improve preparedness and build more resilient communities” . Capability 1 specifically addresses community resilience in the area of community preparedness. These include determining community health risks, identifying vulnerable or at-risk populations and those with access and functional needs, creating community partnerships, engaging community organizations in fostering public health social networks, and coordinating training to improve lay participation in community resilience.
Although these mandates support community-level preparedness activities, there are few evidence-based methods for building community resilience in the United States . It is not clear what local public health should do or what role it should play in building community resilience . Public health officials faced with operationalizing CDC capabilities need both evidence-based strategies for implementing community disaster resilience and evaluation methods for measuring outcomes.
Providing Disaster Recovery For Vmware Horizon
This article describes the theoretical basis, intervention design, and evaluation of a public health program to increase community resilience (CR) in selected neighborhoods of a large urban center. The Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project (LACCDR) provides an opportunity to translate community resilience building theory into practice, strengthen disaster resilience in Los Angeles County communities, and evaluate outcomes. The goal of the LACCDR project is to increase the preparedness of communities and the people who live in them to prepare for, respond to, and recover from a natural disaster, other emergency, or public health event through a community-based approach. This paper aims to provide academic and public health researchers with new tools to conduct their community resilience programs and evaluation research.
As previously reported, the LACCDR project was developed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health over a two-year period in close collaboration with community, academic, government, and commercial partners [16, 17]. During 2010-2012. the project involved a wide range of community stakeholders representing government agencies and community organizations to identify and develop strategies that would strengthen resilience. The project engaged these stakeholders through community forums, working groups and community surveys leading to the design of the LACCDR project .
The LACCDR project is based on collaboration between public health, several academic institutions (UCLA, RAND Corporation, Loma Linda University, USA), governmental and non-governmental agencies (United States Geological Survey Science Application for Risk Reduction, Emergency Network of Los Angeles). , USA), companies (private media consultants) and communities themselves. These stakeholders are part of the LACCDR Steering Committee that leads the implementation and evaluation of the project. The project was funded by a CDC PHEP grant with additional funding provided by the National Institute of Mental Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Pdf] Building Urban Resilience For Disaster Risk Management And Disaster Risk Reduction
The basic design of the LACCDR project is a pretest-posttest with a comparison group design . A list of candidate communities for the project was developed with guidance from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (SPA) and other community leaders. Through this process, the Board of Directors identified communities that fit the following criteria: (1) Population of modest size, ideally less than 50,000 people; (2) Shared identity as a “community” with at least two of the following: local business community; school/school district; police and fire service; public clinic/hospital/health authority; committed community organizations; (3) Sufficient organizational infrastructure of the community to guide the local development of knowledge and capacity i
Contingency planning and disaster recovery, disaster response and recovery strategies and tactics for resilience, business disaster recovery planning, disaster recovery planning process, disaster recovery planning services, continuity planning and disaster recovery, disaster recovery planning tools, disaster recovery planning software, disaster recovery planning checklist, disaster recovery resilience, disaster planning and recovery, disaster recovery planning template